J
Jurnal Transportasi, Logistik, dan Aviasi Abnus Publisher

Improving Discipline through Apron Movement Control (AMC) at PT Angkasa Pura I Adi Soemarmo Airport

2021-07-22
Published
1-17
Pages
OPEN
Access
AS
Aswanti Setyawati
Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
FA
Fransiskus Kresna Aristiyanto
Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the supervision of Standard Operational Procedures (SOP) by the Apron Movement Control (AMC) unit at Adi Soemarmo Surakarta Airport in 2019, focusing on the role of AMC in improving discipline at the airport’s apron. The study also identifies violations that occurred on the airside and assesses the effectiveness of AMC’s supervision.

Research Methodology: A descriptive qualitative approach was used, incorporating interviews, observations, and questionnaires. Data analysis was conducted using the Fishbone diagram method, with a focus on identifying root causes of issues related to airside violations and AMC’s role in enhancing discipline.

Results: The study found that there were 44 violations recorded on the airside in 2019, with the most common violation being driving over 25 km/h on service roads. The role of AMC in improving discipline was influenced by factors such as manpower, machinery, and motivation. Despite effective supervision in some areas, the study highlighted the need for improved communication and better facilities, such as the installation of CCTV for better monitoring.

Conclusions: The supervision carried out by the AMC unit was not optimal, primarily due to limited visibility and inadequate resources. The study emphasizes the importance of enhancing AMC’s surveillance capabilities and coordination with other stakeholders. The training and motivation of AMC officers also need improvement to ensure more effective supervision.

Limitations: The study was constrained by the lack of advanced surveillance technology, such as CCTV coverage for all parking stands, and the varying levels of performance and communication among AMC officers. Future studies could explore the impact of technological enhancements and more structured training programs for AMC personnel.

Contributions: This research provides insights into the role of AMC in airport supervision, highlighting the critical factors affecting its effectiveness and offering recommendations for improving operational efficiency. The findings contribute to the development of more efficient operational strategies for managing apron discipline at Indonesian airports.

Apron Movement Control (AMC) Discipline Supervision Apron
How to Cite
Setyawati, A., & Aristiyanto, F. K. . (2021). Improving Discipline through Apron Movement Control (AMC) at PT Angkasa Pura I Adi Soemarmo Airport. Jurnal Transportasi, Logistik, Dan Aviasi, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.52909/jtla.v1i1.33
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
References
  1. Bae, J. H., & Park, J. W. (2021). Research into individual factors affecting safety within airport subsidiaries. Sustainability, 13(9), 5219. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095219
  2. Chan, W. T. K., & Li, W. C. (2023). Development of effective human factors interventions for aviation safety management. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1144921. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144921
  3. Chang, Y. H., Shao, P. C., & Chen, H. J. (2015). Performance evaluation of airport safety management systems in taiwan. Safety Science, 75, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.12.006
  4. de Sant, D. A. L. M., & de Hilal, A. V. G. (2021). The impact of human factors on pilots’ safety behavior in offshore aviation companies: A brazilian case. Safety Science, 140, 105272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105272
  5. Durmaz, V., Yazgan, E., & Yılmaz, A. K. (2021). Ergonomic risk factors in ground handling operations to improve corporate performance. International Journal of Aviation Science and Technology, 2(02), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.23890/ijast.vm02is02.0205
  6. Ford, J., Henderson, R., & O’Hare, D. (2014). The effects of crew resource management (crm) training on flight attendants’ safety attitudes. Journal of Safety Research, 48, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2013.11.003
  7. Fu, Y. K., & Chan, T. L. (2014). A conceptual evaluation framework for organisational safety culture: An empirical study of taipei songshan airport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 34, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2013.08.005
  8. Hofer, F., & Wetter, O. E. (2012). Operational and human factors issues of new airport security technology—two case studies. Journal of Transportation Security, 5(4), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-012-0096-5
  9. Kierzkowski, A., & Kisiel, T. (2017). The human factor in the passenger boarding process at the airport. Procedia Engineering, 187, 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.385
  10. Kucuk Yilmaz, A. (2019). Strategic approach to managing human factors risk in aircraft maintenance organization: Risk mapping. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 91(4), 654–668. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT06-2018-0160
  11. Leva, M. C., Del Sordo, D., & Mattei, F. (2015). Day-to-day performance management in a small regional airport and management of change for safer operations. Cognition, Technology Work, 17(2), 237–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0298-7
  12. Low, J. M., & Yang, K. K. (2019). An exploratory study on the effects of human, technical and operating factors on aviation safety. Journal of Transportation Safety Security, 11(6), 595–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439962.2018.1458051
  13. Lyu, T., Song, W., & Du, K. (2019). Human factors analysis of air traffic safety based on hfacs-bn model. Applied Sciences, 9(23), 5049. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9235049
  14. MacLean, L., Richman, A., & MacLean, S. (2016). Benchmarking airports with specific safety performance measures. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.016
  15. Majid, S. A., Nugraha, A., Sulistiyono, B. B., Suryaningsih, L., Widodo, S., Kholdun, A. I., & Endri, E. (2022). The effect of safety risk management and airport personnel competency on aviation safety performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(4), 1509–1522. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.6.004
  16. Muecklich, N., Sikora, I., Paraskevas, A., & Padhra, A. (2023). The role of human factors in aviation ground operation-related accidents/incidents: A human error analysis approach. Transportation Engineering, 13, 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.treng.2023.10018
  17. Panagopoulos, I., Atkin, C., & Sikora, I. (2017). Developing a performance indicators lean-sigma framework for measuring aviation system’s safety performance. Transportation Research Procedia, 22, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.005
  18. Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Cioponea, R., & Licu, A. (2019). Safety intelligence: Incremental proactive risk management for holistic aviation safety performance. Safety Science, 118, 551–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.040
  19. Rakas, J., Bauranov, A., & Messika, B. (2018). Failures of critical systems at airports: Impact on aircraft operations and safety. Safety Science, 110, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.05.022
  20. Roelen, A., & Blom, H. A. (2013). Airport safety performance. Modelling and Managing Airport Performance, 7, 171–210. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118535844.ch7
  21. Stolzer, A. J., Friend, M. A., Truong, D., Tuccio, W. A., & Aguiar, M. (2018). Measuring and evaluating safety management system effectiveness using data envelopment analysis. Safety Science, 104, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.037
  22. Strawderman, L., & Koubek, R. (2008). Human factors and usability in service quality measurement. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18(4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20102
  23. Studic, M., Majumdar, A., Schuster, W., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2017). A systemic modelling of ground handling services using the functional resonance analysis method. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 74, 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.004
  24. Teperi, A. M., & Leppänen, A. (2011). Managers’ conceptions regarding human factors in air traffic management and in airport operations. Safety Science, 49(3), 438–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.10.009
  25. U˘gurlu, Ö., Yıldırım, U., & Ba¸sar, E. (2015). Analysis of grounding accidents caused by human error. Journal of Marine Science and Technology–Taiwan, 23(5), 19. https://doi.org/10.5505/jems.2015.57966
  26. Wilke, S., Majumdar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2012). Holistic approach to airport surface safety. Transportation Research Record, 2300(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3141/2300-01
  27. Wilke, S., Majumdar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2014). Airport surface operations: A holistic framework for operations modeling and risk management. Safety Science, 63, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.015
  28. Wilke, S., Majumdar, A., & Ochieng, W. Y. (2015). The impact of airport characteristics on airport surface accidents and incidents. Journal of Safety Research, 53, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.03.006
  29. Xia, N., Zou, P. X., Liu, X., Wang, X., & Zhu, R. (2018). A hybrid bn-hfacs model for predicting safety performance in construction projects. Safety Science, 101, 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.025
  30. Zhang, J., Tian, X., Pan, J., Chen, Z., & Zou, X. (2022). A field study on safety performance of apron controllers at a large-scale airport based on digital tower. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1623. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031623
License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Setyawati, A., & Aristiyanto, F. K. . (2021). Improving Discipline through Apron Movement Control (AMC) at PT Angkasa Pura I Adi Soemarmo Airport. Jurnal Transportasi, Logistik, Dan Aviasi, 1(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.52909/jtla.v1i1.33
Downloads
View PDF PDF · Open Access
Statistics
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): July
Articles