Analysis of Integrated Bus Terminal Services and Their Impact on Customer Satisfaction at Pulo Gebang

2021-05-17
Published
44-55
Pages
OPEN
Access
AS
Aswanti Setyawati
Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
MN
Muhammad Nur Huda
Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
SS
Suripno Suripno
Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
HT
Hendy Tannady
Kalbis Institut, Indonesia
Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the service level of the Pulo Gebang Integrated bus terminal in increasing customer satisfaction.

Research Methodology: The study uses a descriptive quantitative approach based on Creswell’s stages, with data collected through observations, surveys, and interviews at the Pulo Gebang Integrated Bus Terminal. Data were analyzed using SERVQUAL, Importance Performance Analysis (IPA), and Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to evaluate service quality and determine improvement priorities.

Results: Based on the analysis and discussion, the results of the gap analysis between customer perceptions and expectations of 22 service attributes are all negative (-) with a range of -0.15 to -1,49. This indicates that the quality of service is still far from customer expectations, the attributes of interest after analyzing with the Importance Performance Analysis, the priority for improvement is obtained as well as in an effort to improve the quality of customer service at the Pulo Gebang Integrated bus terminal, after analyzing the approach with the Quality Function Deployment method, seven order of priority improvement.

Conclusions: All service attributes show negative gaps, indicating unmet customer expectations. Priority improvements focus on key aspects such as timeliness, access, comfort, staff competence, security, facilities, and cleanliness.

Limitations: This study is limited to a single terminal and short-term survey data, which may not fully represent broader conditions or long-term trends.

Contributions: This study provides an integrated evaluation of service quality using SERVQUAL, IPA, and QFD, and identifies priority improvements to enhance customer satisfaction.

 

Costumer Satisfaction IPA Service Servqual QFD
How to Cite
Setyawati, A., Nur Huda, M. ., Suripno, S., & Tannady, H. . (2021). Analysis of Integrated Bus Terminal Services and Their Impact on Customer Satisfaction at Pulo Gebang. Journal of Economics, Management, Entrepreneurship, and Business, 1(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.52909/jemeb.v1i1.5 (Original work published 2021)
References
  1. Agustina, F., Septiani, N., Suryobuwono, A. A., & Widiyanto, P. (2021). Bus occupancy rate at the pulo gebang integrated terminal and losses during the 2021 eid homecoming ban. Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, 4, 343–351. https://doi.org/10.25292/atlr.v4i0.404
  2. Al Kurdi, B., Alshurideh, M., & Alnaser, A. (2020). Impact of employee satisfaction on customer satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 10(15), 3561–3570. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2020.6.038
  3. Alam, M. S., & Mondal, M. (2019). Assessment of sanitation service quality using servqual. Journal of Urban Management, 8(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.08.002
  4. Alfatiyah, R., & Apriyanto. (2019). Analisis kualitas pelayanan parkir dengan metode servqual, ipa dan qfd. https://doi.org/10.32493/jitmi.v2i2.y2019.p105-115
  5. Angco, R. J. N. (2021). Passenger satisfaction on a bus terminal. American Research Journal of Humanities Social Sciences, 4(10), 74–80.
  6. Aritenang, A. F. (2021). Evaluating city-scale urban mobility restriction in jakarta due to the covid-19 pandemic: The impact on subjective wellbeing. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 9(1), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2021.1987315
  7. Caesaron, D., Makapedua, J., & Lukodono, R. P. (2021). Evaluation of ride-hailing services using servqual, kano, ipa, and qfd. ComTech, 12(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v12i2.6790
  8. Diharjo, S. (2018). Hubungan perubahan sosial ekonomi penghuni dengan karakteristik hunian pulogebang. Jurnal Muara Sains, 2(2), 364–371. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v2i2.1041
  9. Erdil, N. O., & Arani, O. M. (2019). Quality function deployment: More than a design tool. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(2), 142–166. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2018-0008
  10. Ferza, R., Hamudy, M. I. A., & Rifki, M. S. (2019). Tirtonadi bus terminal services: An innovation derailed? Jurnal Bina Praja, 11(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.11.2019.171-183
  11. Ghozali, I. (2011). Spss 13.0 terapan: Riset statistik dan parametrik. CV Andi Offset.
  12. Hamzah, A. A., & Shamsudin, M. F. (2020). Why customer satisfaction is important to business. Journal of Undergraduate Social Science and Technology, 1(1).
  13. Hardiono, G., & Harsasto, P. (2018). Networking dalam kebijakan optimalisasi terminal terpadu pulo gebang. Journal of Politic and Government Studies, 7(2), 161–170.
  14. Hasbiyalloh, H., & Masya, F. (2018). Aplikasi sistem inspeksi bus berbasis web pada terminal pulo gebang. JUSS, 1(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.22437/juss.v1i2.5926
  15. Hidayati, I., Yamu, C., & Tan, W. (2019). Mobility inequality in greater jakarta. Sustainability, 11(18), 5115. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185115
  16. Kayapınar, S., & Erginel, N. (2019). Designing airport service with fuzzy qfd based on servqual. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(13-14), 1429–1448. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1371586
  17. Krisantinus, Y., Siahaan, U., & Simatupang, S. (2021). Bus terminal planning with tod approach for jakarta. IOP Conference Series, 878, 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/878/1/012019
  18. Mukti, I. Y., & Prambudia, Y. (2018). Challenges in governing the digital transportation ecosystem in jakarta: A research direction in smart city frameworks. Challenges, 9(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe9010014
  19. Ochwo, B. O., & Mwesigwa, D. (2021). Reward strategies and job satisfaction in private companies. Annals of Human Resource Management Research, 1(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.35912/ahrmr.v1i1.406
  20. Ok, S., Suy, R., Chhay, L., & Choun, C. (2018). Customer satisfaction and service quality in marketing practice. Asian Themes in Social Sciences Research, 1(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.33094/journal.139.2018.11.21.27
  21. Otto, A. S., Szymanski, D. M., & Varadarajan, R. (2020). Customer satisfaction and firm performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00657-7
  22. Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis based swot analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44, 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009
  23. Putri, S. I., Sumartini, & Sofia, A. (2017). Metode service quality (servqual) dan qfd sebagai usulan perbaikan kualitas pelayanan. Jurnal Ilmu Manajemen & Bisnis, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/jimb.v8i1.12656
  24. Rangkuti, F. (2012). Studi kelayakan bisnis & investasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  25. Rifai, A. I., Rafianda, D. F., Isradi, M., & Mufhidin, A. (2021). Analysis of customer satisfaction on covid-19 protocol in bus terminal. Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology, 1(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.52088/ijesty.v1i1.105
  26. Saffan, D., Syairudin, B., & Achmadi, F. (2018). Analisis kepuasan pelayanan dan loyalitas pelanggan dengan menggunakan metode servqual, ipa, dan qfd di terminal teluk lamong. Business and Finance Journal, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33086/bfj.v3i1.412
  27. Sakti, F. T. (2020). Terminal management policy and passenger accessibility at cicaheum terminal. CosmoGov, 6(1), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v6i1.25736
  28. Siddique, G., & Basak, A. (2018). Importance-performance analysis (ipa) of service quality in public transport of asansol-durgapur development authority. The International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER), 8(8).
  29. Sukwadi, R., Josua, P. P., & Tannady, H. (2021). Penerapan integrasi fuzzy servqual-ipa-qfd dalam analisis kualitas layanan stasiun gambir. Jurnal Muara Sains, 5(1), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmstkik.v5i1.9628
  30. Supranto, J. (2016). Statistik teori dan aplikasi. Erlangga.
  31. Wedagama, D. M. P., Suthanaya, P. A., & Pramana, P. C. A. (2020). Analisis kinerja layanan angkutan umum massal bus trans sarbagita berdasarkan persepsi kepuasan penumpang. Jurnal Spektran, 8(1), 11–18.
  32. Yudhistira, M. H., Indriyani, W., Pratama, A. P., Sofiyandi, Y., & Kurniawan, Y. R. (2019). Transportation network and urban structure changes. Research in Transportation Economics, 74, 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.12.003
  33. Zehmed, K., & Jawab, F. (2020). A combined approach based on fuzzy servperf and dea for measuring and benchmarking the quality of urban bus transport service at the route level. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 19(2), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2020.19.2.442

How to Cite

Setyawati, A., Nur Huda, M. ., Suripno, S., & Tannady, H. . (2021). Analysis of Integrated Bus Terminal Services and Their Impact on Customer Satisfaction at Pulo Gebang. Journal of Economics, Management, Entrepreneurship, and Business, 1(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.52909/jemeb.v1i1.5 (Original work published 2021)
Downloads
View PDF PDF · Open Access
Statistics

Similar Articles

1-10 of 13

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.